||the board can over-rule the
chair if it does like the chair's decision.
(It cannot, only the courts can.)
||The board can appoint
replacement directors until there is an election.
(Again. that decision needs to be made by the courts.)
property management company's faulty records denied owners the right to
vote. (An oppressed owner needs to go to the courts for relief.)
||more than 400 proxies were
different inks against more than three candidates.
||I and 100 unit owners are the
eye witnessed of more than 400 similar proxies you accepted but luckily
color of pen was same should not be the basis that proxy was written,
time with proxy owner hand writing.
||Smart Candidates always keeps
different color ink pen for such type of activities but the loser
||ATAUL HAQ MALICK my last one hr
friend misused MGT office, mislead home
owners to drop proxy in Ycc 42 office to Phone NO: 416-622-3422,
collected 100 proxies only signed by
||95% unit owners gave verbal
authority to Candidate to do what ever he want to do with the proxy.
||Why proxy holders are giving
to candidates because of relationship, neighborhood, trust. 99%
candidates treated their
proxies in a similar manner and in future they will continue treating
the same way.
||In my opinion during final whole
process, the method of rejection, adopted for proxy by proxy was
illegal without merit.
||Lot of proxies were handed over
to one group
recalled and handed over to other group by the same owner.
||In this election at least 75,
and up to 290, proxies were altered.
(Justice Penny ruled that 75 proxies were tampered with.)
|•||Candidates and others, who have
a direct interest in the election results, may tamper with the proxies
in their possession removing certain candidate names and adding in
|•||Condo corporations that have a
large number of apathetic and absentee owners are vulnerable to proxy
|•||Some condos have a long history
of proxy abuse.